Earth System Science Center and Department of Atmospheric Science at The University of Alabama in Huntsville

UAH part of team researching tropical trees hit by lightning

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (July 12, 2017) — Trees and lightning generally don’t play well together. However, while many trees struck by lightning explode or ignite or are otherwise instantly killed, other trees (especially in the tropics) seem less effected by lightning strikes and live for a while. Some eventually recover.

Is that because some lightning strokes are more powerful or longer lasting than other lightning strokes? Or does it have something to do with the trees themselves or the vines that entangle them?

Scientists don’t know the answers to those questions (although they have a couple of hypotheses).

This summer, a team of scientists from The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) is installing lightning-monitoring instruments on an island in the Panama Canal as part of a National Science Foundation-supported experiment to better understand the interaction between trees and lightning.

“The interaction between lightning and trees is complicated,” said Dr. Phillip Bitzer, an associate professor in UAH’s Atmospheric Science Department. “This is a first attempt at understanding that interaction.”

A pair of atmospheric electric field change meters (made with stainless steel salad bowls from Target) and an array of high-speed cameras will help Bitzer and his team pinpoint where lightning from Panama’s frequent wet season storms strikes on Barro Colorado, a large island in the canal that is home to a research station run by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI).

With data pinpointing those strikes within a few meters, ecologist Steve Yanoviak and his team from the University of Louisville, and STRI scientists have a good chance of finding trees that are hit by lightning. They want quick feedback on which trees are killed and which trees survive, so they can gather information about population dynamics and, in part, so they can track the ongoing health of surviving trees.

“Some trees, particularly in tropical forests, seem to get hit with no ill effects,” Bitzer said. “Some are dead instantly. Others survive, but die within weeks or months thereafter. Sometimes lightning hits a tree, which suffers damage, which seems to send up the ‘party’ flag to all the local insects, which could explain the delayed mortality.”

Another hypothesis being tested is that lianas (woody vines) that cover some tropical trees act like lightning rods or grounding wires to channel lightning to the ground before it can damage the host tree.

“Perhaps they have a lower electrical resistance, so they would make better conductors for lightning to flow through to the ground,” Bitzer said. “The liana will be destroyed, but the tree will be spared. Initial analysis of preliminary data (from three years of prior research) seems to indicate that is the case, at least sometimes.”

The $350,000 NSF research grant will support operations on Barro Colorado through three rainy seasons. The research team expects about 100 to 150 lightning strikes on the island during each wet season, which should be a large enough sample to provide the data needed to answer the unanswered scientific questions.

One of the advantages of doing the research on Barro Colorado, Bitzer said, is that on some parts of the island every tree has been counted, measured and recorded as part of earlier forest ecology projects.

“The forest is fairly well documented,” he said. “There are areas where every tree has been tagged, and the STRI scientists can tell you how old it is and everything about that tree.”

In addition to helping pinpoint each lightning stroke, the electric field change meters also provide information about each stroke, including its peak current and the duration of each lightning strike. Bitzer is particularly interested in the effects of lightning that lasts longer than normal lightning.

Most cloud-to-ground lightning (about 8 of 9) is a rapid series of strikes, each lasting a few hundredths of millions of a second — much too fast for our eyes to separate into individual events. The other one in nine (give or take) creates a channel in the air, through which lightning’s current can flow for tens to thousands of times longer than a normal lightning flash.

While that might still be only a few hundredths of a second, this continuing current lightning makes things sizzle.

“If it hits a tree, for instance, the longer the current flows the hotter the tree will get,” Bitzer said. “We think continuing current lightning is responsible for a disproportionate percentage of the fires caused by lightning.”

The project in Panama gives Bitzer a tool to test his theories about continuing current by matching data about individual lightning strikes with data about its effects on individual trees.

“Does the physics of the lightning effect the tree?” Bitzer asked. “Is continuing current lightning just as damaging in the tropics, but in a different way? Outside of the tropics, continuing current lightning causes forest fires.”

— 30 —

Photo caption: Lightning strikes in a tropical rainforest near Barro Colorado island in the Panama Canal during a 2016 wet season storm. (UAH photo/Jeffrey Burchfield)

For more information:

Dr. Phillip Bitzer, (256) 824-4028
bitzerp@uah.edu

Phillip Gentry, (256) 961-7618
gentry@nsstc.uah.edu

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: